Absolutely correct of course. =
I do think I mentioned the value =
of our
group rules in my post. I can not tell you how many times in life I have =
written
a flaming reply and NOT sent it, then later discovered help from that =
person and
how friendly and reasonable they were indeed.
And we do disagree on a few =
things. It is
always about free speech and the constitution whether you agree or not. =
We
freely agree to rules to make gaining =
information
and know how easy and =
efficient. If you
squelch free speech it does not become easy and efficient. It becomes =
clogged
with defensiveness and circumvention. That is just the way it is and =
there is
plenty of human resource research to back up my claims. Self-directed =
process
always works better in the long run. Imposed conformity just does not =
work. Just
look at how many postings emerge on this issue which are not information =
and
know how related (unless you consider "communication" good =
information and
know how.)
William
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 =
10:05
AM
Subject: Re: Rules and foul
language
It is not =
about free
speech or frustration ect... It is about courtesy to one another =
regardless of
how we feel at the time.I know I have done some dumb stuff . The =
list is
for gaining information and know how not a forum on the constitution . =
I am a
very tolerent person and besids the person that flames you today , =
deserved or not, may have your answers tomorrow and you will be glad =
YOU were
courteous.