After having heard this arguement =
for the last
couple of days, I decided to put in my own take on this =
issue.
1. Engine braking is required with =
these vans: I
have an 85 GL and live right next to the Cascade mountain range in =
Oregon.
Less than a week ago I went to go visit a college friend on the other =
side of
the range (Klamath Falls to Ashland via 66). Coming down into the =
valley
that Ashland is in, the road turns into a steep, downhill, slolom =
track.
Half way down the hill, my brakes had faded to almost nothing, requiring =
me to
mash on the brakes, throw it into second, and do 30mph down the rest of =
the
hill, letting my engine do all of my braking, and being content with 30 =
mph
instead of 35-40mph. Without the engine braking, I would have =
flown over
the edge (there were no guard rails).
2. It is the air cooled engines that can be damaged =
by the
engine braking. This is due to the engine coming to very high =
temps while
going up a mountain pass, and then the rapid cool down that comes with =
the
engine braking going down the other side of the pass causes the metals =
in the
engine to contract rapidly, mainly the cylinder liners cooling and =
contracting
faster than the pistons, causing excessive wear and tear on the pistons =
and
liners. This is where the rumor about engine braking being bad for =
your
engine started. The water cooled engines have the water jackets =
and
thermostats to maintain engine temp., therefore avoiding the rapid cool =
down
problems.
mckayaa@oit.edu
college student =
in
mechanical engineering at Oregon Institute of Technology
'85 vanagon
GL