And I =
have an
encyclopedia that is 5 times the size of your three manuals put =
togeather.
Furthermore, Tolstoy's "War and Peace"contains many times more words =
than your
manuals; not to mention the proposed Federal Budget. That cannot be =
matched for
sheer size.
The trouble is; if I want =
some info on
a particular part on my Vanagon I think it would take quiet a while to =
find it
in any of the above tomes. A similar difficulity would, I believe, =
present
itself if one searched your "more comprehensive" Audi, Passat or Jetta
manuals.
What does this mean? =
Obviously
Gross Registered Tonnage does not, in itself, mean a thing. In the 6 =
years I
have had the Westy and the Bentley I have yet to search for something I =
did not
find.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 =
7:47 AM
Subject: Re: Bentley really =
sucks
Dear List,
The Bentley manual for my Audi 200 is =
THREE
TIMES the size of the Vanagon manual.
The Bentley manual for my =
1996 Passat
is TWICE the size of the Vanagon manual.
The Bentley manual for a =
1997
Jetta is THE SAME length as the Vanagon manual.
What does this =
mean?
Obviously VW/Audi instructs Bentley to write "more comprehensive" =
manuals for
their "more expensive" vehicles. In short: the Vanagon Bentley manual =
really
does "suck" when compared to other
Bentley's!!!!
Cheers,
MJS
At 09:47 PM 5/2/99 =
-0700,
Zezoff wrote:
>I have Mercedes manuals and they are incredible. =
I
suggest you all buy a
>used Mercedes instead of VWs. I own both, =
so I
speak from experience.
>
>The Westy is a 82 diesel. The =
Bentley
manual gives me no clue at all.
Michael J.
Sullivan
Director of Catalog Design
Open Market,
=
Inc.
*********************************************
phone:
781.359.7624
work: http://www.openmarket.com
scan tips:
http://www.hsdesign.com/scanning
vanagon:
=
http://www.hsdesign.com/vanagon
**************************************=
*******