Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2000, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:35:06 -0700
Reply-To:     Daniel Schmitz <djs@gene.com>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Daniel Schmitz <djs@gene.com>
Organization: Genentech, Inc.
Subject:      Re: RV Registration (Was  Fw: Alcohol Consmption In Westies!
              (longish)
Comments: To: Brent Christensen <brent@vanagon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Brent,

I think the Use Tax is actually just a sales tax that is collected whenever a vehicle changes ownership via a financial transaction.

But it begs an important and nagging question: What interest or right does California have in collecting a sales tax on a used car purchase between private parties? On vehicles which are bought and resold within the state, sales tax was paid at the time of original purchase. To charge sales tax each time a vehicle changes hands seems to me to be redundant, if not double-dipping. But I'm sure many on this list are aware of having to ante up an amount equal to some percentage of their purchase price and hand it over to their DMV. I know many people usually agree with the buyer to a lesser purchase price on paper for the sole purpose of reducing this tax, and I have done this myself in the past.

On used vehicles purchased outside the state, such as my Westfalia purchased in Colorado, someone else may or may not have paid that state's sales tax in the original purchase, depending on Colorado's tax system. Again, of what interest is it to California to collect a sales tax from one of its residents just because that resident purchased a vehicle outside the state?

This has nothing to do with the recently rescinded California "Smog Transfer Fee" or whatever it was called. I believe that gem was finally deemed unconstitutional.

What else do we have to pay sales tax on (repeatedly) besides used vehicles?

Sorry for possibly starting another endless thread on the evils of taxation. This and the traffic in the SF Bay Area make me consider moving to another state. Like Colorado.

(But we do have great weather, although summer in San Francisco can be like winter in Minnesota)

Dan

Brent Christensen wrote:

> That sounds EXACTLY like my story. (I was over a year over due, but my > registration was current the whole time) The buggers! > > Brent > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Schmitz" <djs@gene.com> > To: "Brent Christensen" <brent@vanagon.com> > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 10:30 PM > Subject: Re: RV Registration (Was Fw: Alcohol Consmption In Westies! > (longish) > > > Brent, > > > > Virtually no difference, from what I can tell, but that's how they > classify it. > > > > I also had to pay just over $1000 to register my '87 Westfalia. The bulk > of > > that amount was the Use Tax due on the $8500 purchase price. The rest was > reg > > fees and penalties due to me being over 30 days delinquent in registering > the > > van after I purchased it. I think the portion of the total fee that is > actually > > the registration may be have been a few dollars less due to being an "RV" > vs a > > passenger car, from what the DMV person said, but it's not much of a > > difference. > > > > Dan > > > > Brent Christensen wrote: > > > > > Dan: > > > > > > What difference did it make in classifying the vehicle as an RV? I just > > > registered my Syncro and it cost me damned near $1,000 with the "use > taxes" > > > and such... > > > > > > Brent Christensen > > > '89 GL Syncro Westy "Klaus" > > > Santa Barbara, CA > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Daniel Schmitz" <djs@gene.com> > > > To: "Brent Christensen" <brent@vanagon.com> > > > Cc: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > > > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:24 PM > > > Subject: Re: [VANAGON] Fw: Alcohol Consmption In Westies! (longish) > > > > > > ---snip... > > > > > > > When I registered my Colorado-purchased Westfalia here in California, > the > > > DMV > > > > required me to bring it in to verify the VIN and inspect the vehicle. > At > > > that > > > > time, they noted that because it includes a bed, stove and fridge, it > > > meets the > > > > basic definition of an RV, rather than a passenger vehicle. Of course, > > > it's > > > > simply a passenger vehicle with a bed, stove and fridge, but the DMV > > > classifies > > > > as an RV for registration purposes. > > > > > > > > Those better informed or having a differing opinion may now commence > > > > disagreeing. > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > >

-- Dan __________________________________________________ Dan Schmitz - Genentech Automation Engineering djs@gene.com (650) 225-6119 __________________________________________________

"I'll so offend to make offense a skill Redeeming time when men least think I will"

W. Shakespeare Henry IV, Part 1


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.